I'm not saying it's AI. But founder build a platform around this issue and then discovered that this issue is hard?
If it's not an AI-slop, it still shows a sloppy reasoning.
He claims anyone can build what he build, and furthermore that he doesn't know how to actually solve the outreach problem. So essentially he did nothing and achieved nothing and instead only moving on, he decides to double down.
Site menu doesn't work, half of pages are missing, I tried to learn what his plans are moving forward, and couldn't find anything.
Even with AI, if you want to sell people on the idea that you personally can make a site, you should present a site that works.
If you claim that there is a solution, you should present an evidence.
It's not enough to say "everyone can do it with AI". I wouldn't trust a site like that not to leak my info.
Even if it's not AI, it still sloppy.
I understand if it was a blog rant, but it's not.