[latexr]

> I would say that in another decade, at least some of what I’m working on will be taken for granted by millions of computer users.

It’s been over a decade since the interview. Anyone familiar with anything Raskin was working then that is ubiquitous now?

[47282847]

His research work was pretty foundational. Highly recommend his book! It’s timeless, especially since he did his explorations in a time before users were already “poisoned” by existing concepts and expectations - which is also a topic in his book.

[andai]

The interview is from 2005. Jef passed away a month later.

[a4isms]

Jef was a huge proponent of incremental search. That hasn't become mainstream-ubiquitous, but it is certainly code-editor-ubiquitous. Jef being an extremist, he wanted incremental search as the only mechanism for moving the cursor.

I have tried editing using only incremental search, and it was awful right up until the moment when I reached for it first instead of wanting a mouse or arrow key and then remembering I was only supposed to use incremental search.

From that moment on, I sailed along just fine. Does that mean it might have "won?" Certainly not, but all the same... Success in software design is absolutely not any kind of meritocracy outside of the tautological "If it won, it must have merit, winning is the metric for merit."

[jdougan]

I'm curious as to how time efficient that actually was.