[amazingamazing]

Both companies don't mind weaponization. The difference is whether it should only be domestic. Both are ok with foreigners being bombed.

[ethbr1]

Do you have a citation for that?

Because the Anthropic's presentation of their position doesn't have a domestic or foreign caveat to autonomous weapons. It's a categorical no.

https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-department-of-war

[amazingamazing]

> We support the use of AI for lawful foreign intelligence and counterintelligence missions. But using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values.

Your link

[ethbr1]

Yes. They draw that distinction on intelligence.

I was asking about autonomous weapons.

>> Both companies don't mind weaponization. The difference is whether it should only be domestic. Both are ok with foreigners being bombed.

[DonsDiscountGas]

That aligns with average human values