[perching_aix]

An appeal to a religious text being presented as a robust argument borders on mockery. Especially after it follows a claim about how the position at hand is one that needs not to be qualified. Why are you qualifying it then? Is it because you (correctly) sense that you're presenting it as a fact of the world, rather than just as your opinion, and feel the gap in justification?

[hardbass]

If a religious text is cited in anything non-religious, the religion or religious text should be proven physically true first, otherwise dismissed from use.