|
|
|
|
|
|
by selcuka
14 days ago
|
|
|
What I said is not subjective/speculative. It is not even unfalsifiable. To restate, COVID vaccine can't be used as an example of "science/technology's sympathy towards the bottom rungs". They were only accessible because governments purchased those vaccines from science/technology companies and gave away for free. Companies developed it to make profit. If the governments didn't purchase billions of doses at a subsidised price, most people wouldn't be able to afford it [1]. I don't see how this conclusion is subjective, speculative, or unfalsifiable? [1] https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/covid-19-vaccines-what-i... |
|
|