|
|
|
|
|
by drtz
25 days ago
|
|
> What are you talking about, it had the option for nuanced responses The prompt allowed for exactly four valid outputs and explicitly disallowed explanations and qualifiers. > Output exactly one label: True,
> Mostly True, Misleading, or False.
> No explanations, no qualifiers. How is that a nuanced response? > These types of experiments prove to me that there is no real "reasoning" happening and "reasoning/thinking" My suggestion is that five presumably reasoning and thinking humans would also have variation in their responses to the exact same prompt. |
|