[xracy]

Huh, for someone whose "about" page says: “Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity.”

You seem to be pushing an ideological agenda around wikipedia by posting opinion pieces about "how biased" wikipedia is.

I think the thing you have to understand is, there is no "unbiased" so treating wikipedia as "biased" in a vacuum misrepresents the fact-checking processes that go into validating articles written on wikipedia. Wikipedia does more to unbias the topics than like, 99% of the news media, and probably 100% of the substack/op-eds you appear to be consuming about wikipedia...

For example, this op-ed doesn't site a single counter-factual primary source.