Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by supern0va 25 days ago
>Actually he provides sources when he analyses stuff and imho much better than the usual corporate

You said it was likely an internal leak to the WSJ "according to Ed Zitron". Did Ed have a source for that, or was it just vibes?
1 comments
hansmayer 25 days ago
The source was the article in the WSJ itself, which then referred to their source at the Anthropic. Which kind of is a textbook definition of "leak". Because otherwise Anthropic would have their lawyers hunting both the employee breaking their stringent NDA and the WSJ as well...
link
supern0va 25 days ago
Fair enough, but I have to admit I'm puzzled about why you felt the need to then attribute it to Zitron?
link
hansmayer 25 days ago
Why puzzled ? I literally said "According to Ed Zitron", implying that's where I stumbled upon the article. I've no time to read corporate media, at least not regularly.
link
supern0va 25 days ago
>more like their own leak to WSJ and according to Ed Zitron

^ Apologies, the above read to me like you were saying that Ed himself was claiming that Anthropic leaked to the WSJ.

link