|
|
|
|
|
by switchbak
25 days ago
|
|
I spent a bunch of time on a task that we've chatted about for WEEKS. At the PR review time of this lengthy process, I get a bunch of AI slop saying:
- this looks like it changes X to Y, did you mean to do this? Worth another look? It's SO frustrating. Just copy pasted BS. Are we really paying someone 6 figures to copy and paste into a prompt all day? This is madness. |
|
In their followup review, again copy-pasted, it made a new recommendation - which was the way I had done it originally. Absolutely no human conviction behind the review, just copy-paste ping-pong feedback.
The way I got around it was by implementing my original change again, and writing a stronger defense of it, with lots of references, and calling out as many downsides to their initial recommendation as possible, in an attempt to prompt-inject and overwhelm whatever model they were feeding my work into, and it worked. It gave me a very grim view of the near future.