|
|
|
|
|
|
by nailer
22 days ago
|
|
|
> But then persist in writing programs despite knowing that goal isn't and never will be achievable? Because, asides from users interacting with less programs than they do websites it’s not possible for a user to systematically fix all the programs they interact with. You are proposing an 0(n) solution instead of an 0(1) solution. That should be incredibly obvious before this discussion even started, and even more obvious after reading this far in the thread. You’re replying but you’re not paying attention to what you’re reading. I’m not going to bother continue reading or interacting with you any further. |
|
|