| > On this North American-dominated forum, It’s hard to not notice. > "Asia" is rarely used in the expansive definition that encompasses also the Middle East which is necessary for Islam to be called the majority religion. Even Pakistan rarely gets included. The OP presumably wasn't thinking of Islam in his definition of Asia, as Islam is obviously an external-directed religion. That’s fair. But you’re the one who said the continent. > If your source of knowledge of these religons is visiting Wikipedia in search of a pedantic gotcha quotation, I don't think you have any qualifications for contributing to this subthread. Try at least reading a substantial book about Hindu popular devotion, which doesn't involve meditation, and spend some time in India watching it. Hinduism is a million and one things, but most of them are (as I said) the domain of a few. Now the framing has completely moved. Your motivation for replying was because of these assumptions around Buddhism. Yeah? Well the same goes for Hinduism or whatever religion is far-enough-to-the-East. (That someone initially characterized The West and The East with this dichotomous thinking wasn’t a problem for anyone here so that’s presumably fine.) So when I mention Hinduism it’s not because I know anything about Hinduism, compared to your venerable self. It’s exactly because Buddhism and Hinduism are closely associated in the typical, dumb, brutish brains of Westerners like me; meditation, yoga (associated with Hinduism, associated with meditation), yogis, “mysticism”. Hence why Buddhism? Not because we KNOW Hinduism better than we know Lipton Tea. But because the associations are similar. But it’s about size across the continent one minute, even though the previous minute indigenous religion in the archipelago nation of Japan was an important a question as answering the question about Asia with Buddhism. |