[strongpigeon]

> You don't have to worry about rent increases

I'd also argue there are financial advantages (on top of the psychological ones) to the price stability as you don't have to hedge against your housing cost shooting up as much.

[hdgvhicv]

And it’s not just psychological ones, the cost of moving is expensive, so if you landlord decides to get rid of you then you’re on the hook. You’re also vulnerable to local price increases - of the area you live in increases in value because the school Gets better, prices increase, and you have to move and your kids have to move school.

[ThrustVectoring]

Owning the asset is an advantage in a bull market and a disadvantage in a bear market. If a dominant employer or industry in an area has mass layoffs, that can cascade into the housing market, driving your property underwater at the same time your job vanishes. This happened to a large number of autoworkers in Detroit in 2008.

[danny_codes]

Depends where you live. Any sensible municipality will tax land at it's value, so your costs should rise according to value. Of course most municipalities are failures when it comes to taxation, so probably it's a better deal to own land in those places.

[asdff]

Depends where you live. CA has prop 13 but other places you are reassessed regularly and plenty of homeowners are surprised to get priced out of their homes.