|
|
|
|
|
by KingMachiavelli
18 days ago
|
|
1. Born in typical midwest American town from American parents also born in the US just as their parents (at least 4 generations)
2. Nope, met after arrival.
3. Studies completed and employed legally.
4. "How soon after her last entry to the US did you get married" - actually maybe an issue, we just happened to travel internationally before deciding to get married sooner. But it would be silly to not return to the country you live and work in just because you took a vacation.
5. CBP doesn't even ask questions when you re-enter with valid visa documentation.
6. No previous marriages of either party.
7. No criminal history, not even a speeding ticket.
8. Nope, went to school, graduated, started working, so on. We live together and spend >90% of our non-working time together so I can't imagine an interview being a problem. As you can see, besides maybe the "crime" of taking an international vacation, our case is as simple as it should be. > Also, anecdotally, USCIS seems to be taking advantage at interviews of people who don't have a lawyer by threatening the citizen to withdraw the case or by getting the citizen or immigrant to agree not facts that aren't in evidence or aren't true and then using those facts to deny or delay the case. I mean that's really the issue. USCIS appears to be intentionally adversarial. |
|