|
|
|
|
|
|
by specproc
17 days ago
|
|
|
Hard disagree. In the prediction market case, we're seeing many categories of people being incentivised to act on markets: soldiers, diplomats, staffers, journalists, businesses, sports and esports teams, as a quick, non-exhaustive list. Do you think regulation of all possible categories of people who could behave adversely to influence prediction markets would be preferable to just regulating the market itself? |
|
|