[M4R5H4LL]

With a mortgage, you are forced to save money. In other words you have no way around being disciplined. So yes in theory you could probably make more money with aggressive investing, but chances are most people would risk too much and lose a lot and never have the mental discipline of saving the excess they have no matter what happens in their life.

[kube-system]

Only on paper.

You can borrow from your property’s value by neglecting maintenance, and that is sometimes even harder to notice than dollars in a bank account.

This is one of the ways condo ownership can bite you.

[mothballed]

And then hope you're not one of the ~1/3 that end in a divorce at which point your house gets firesold to first low-balling flipper. House can be really bad anytime it's multiple people liquidating it -- I watched some other family members inherit a house and it sold for about half it's value because some family members weren't willing to wait more than a millisecond for the inheritance payout.

[bloomca]

All you need is to invest into the index funds tracking some sort of the total market and you are golden. Not sure if I would describe that as aggressive.

But I fully agree that mortgage forces people to actually save money, most people would just spend it all.

[01100011]

I made plenty of money (and still do) holding US treasuries and other safe investments. You don't need to gamble on stocks to have income from cash which offsets rent.

[hunterpayne]

For most of my life, fixed income was outperformed by inflation. Indexed funds returned double fixed income over that entire period. Either you are in your 20s or you aren't nearly as good at investing as you think.

[01100011]

I'm fine with keeping most of my post-tax cash pile in cash equivalents. I don't think you understand investing if your only measuring stick is returns. You do sound like a finance bro though given you took time out of your day to trash talk someone for something they didn't even claim.

[hunterpayne]

If your investment return is less than the rate of inflation, you are literally getting poorer. Sort of defeats the purpose of an investment. It isn't much better than literally keeping it in your mattress. Just because you don't understand that, doesn't make it not true. And software I wrote probably has managed or touched your money at some point.

[01100011]

Ok, and? You don't manage money. You don't seem to understand risk tolerance and opportunity cost. You're also comparing near-inflation returns with cash at zero pct return.

I can see why you only write software and don't actually get to touch other folks' money. Good luck buddy.