[theragra]

Users think otherwise. I agree it is dystopian, but to me it is the same bucket as sex work. There are people that won't be able to get a sex partner in a "normal" way. The only way for them is sex workers.

I assume the same is true here. A lot of people have real trouble to get romantic partner, and AI filla the void. It may look bad from the outside, but I don't think normal people can judge romantically deprived.

What would be even more dystopian than AI-partner society is not only to blame incels for each and any issue, but also to disallow them even right to use AI for romantic feelings.

[dpark]

I’m not blaming incels. I’m blaming the people building companies with the express goal of extracting money from them.

There is no moral imperative to allow predatory behavior. We can recognize the difficulty many experience with romantic relationships without blessing others to take advantage of them.

I also very much doubt that people struggling with romantic relationships actually show any measure of mental health improvement after engaging with these AI bots. I imagine the pattern is one of addiction, where participants feel better while actively using the product but then worse at baseline because none of their actual problems have improved.

[ericmcer]

That is a sort of a nightmare. On demand sex work for extremely low cost with 0 risk of disease...

We are slowly stripping everyone of the will to build meaningful lives by fulfilling all wants with soulless instant gratification. No perfection of AI/sex work or whatever can match actual intimacy with someone.

That is at the root of most of our current societal ills I believe. Bad economy, Bad job market, etc. are all a smokescreen over the fact that people can escape their problems. You can live a numb half-life and avoid any crisis that might trigger real change.

If a bad economic outlook was all it took to wipe out the birth rate we would never have survived the great depression or other 10,000 hard times we have endured as a species.

[scotty79]

> You can live a numb half-life and avoid any crisis that might trigger real change.

Changes go both ways and people on the bottom don't have a good track record regarding changes they experienced in their lives. Is it worth taking a risk for 1 that gets better while statistically 99 will get even worse?

Should we rely on letting crisis happen to improve thigs?

[LorenPechtel]

I would agree with this if the AI was actually a reasonable partner. But the AIs are heavily slanted towards agreeing with the user and thus very prone to leading them down rabbit holes rather than keeping them out of rabbit holes.

And the problem with incels is that they have been lead down the rabbit hole of hate. Which is, unfortunately, quite understandable given how much disdain the romantically challenged get.

[bigstrat2003]

Providing an AI "companion" to those who are lonely is kind of like selling drugs to addicts. Yes, it's what they are seeking, and yes, they are suffering. But what you're giving them causes them to suffer more, not less, and it's evil to profit by giving people something that is harming them even if they ask for it.

[pixel_popping]

How exactly do you think it is harming them? (not teenagers and so-on), curious of your take. Sometimes treatments are useful even if you can't get out of it. AI companions will never disappear, that's sure, so it's not like giving something temporarily and then removing it.

I don't really use any form of AI as companion, but I do use it for introspection, I wouldn't say it's harmful, I think it depends on the depth of it.

[bigstrat2003]

I think that computers can't be a meaningful companion, because they aren't actually sentient. They can't truly sympathize with you, nudge you to grow when needed, and so on. Moreover, I think that treating a machine as a friend (or a lover) is going to stunt one's ability to connect with actual humans.

It's kind of like (though not exactly the same as) guys who watch crazy amounts of porn and jerk off all the time. Those guys have reported that when they are with a real woman, they sometimes can't even get hard (because a real person can't match the stimulation of the artificial thing designed to be as stimulating as possible), or can't have an orgasm (because a vagina isn't as tight as the grip they use when jerking it). In those cases, the outlet those guys were using to fill that need has ruined their ability to enjoy the healthier alternative. I believe that AI "companionship" is going to prove to have a similar effect.

[scotty79]

Harm reduction programs where you give addicts narcotics safely have an amazing track record

[Nuzzerino]

You’re right, we should kick them while they are down instead, starving them of all “companionship” (otherwise, how could we uphold our current values as a society)? We need to keep producing a regular supply of [redacted] to rally people against in order to maintain the illusion of morale.

[bigstrat2003]

I didn't say that, any more than I said we should round up all drug addicts and shoot them. What I am saying is that giving a struggling person something which soothes his pain in the short term, while worsening his problem over the long term, is not compassionate treatment. It is preying on the less fortunate, and we should not tolerate it as a society.

[danudey]

I mean, this seems like another step further.

Having an actual romantic partner provides physical and emotional intimacy.

Hiring a sex worker provides physical intimacy and no emotional intimacy (unless you're paying for that as well, I suppose), but lonely people can project onto the SW and mistake physical intimacy for emotional intimacy. That can be unhealthy.

With this, there's no physical intimacy and a simulated level of barebones interaction, meaning that you're getting the physical release but no actual intimacy and none of the other stuff that comes with any sort of relationship, let alone a romantic one, let alone a healthy and rewarding romantic one.

There's a time and a place for this, but it's a digital sex toy and that's all. AI isn't filling the void of a romantic partner any more than eating a bacon double cheeseburger every day is filling the void of a healthy balanced diet. It keeps the body going, but it doesn't deliver what you and your body need to thrive.

(All of this outside of the context of asexual/aromantic individuals, who may or may not need or want or be comfortable with any level of any of this and for whom this might be the perfect product for all I know.)