|
|
|
|
|
by TheCycoONE
24 days ago
|
|
It's the most common sports related head injury by a wide margin and helmets are quite effective at injury reduction.[1] As a public health policy it makes a lot of sense. Anecdotally I've flown over my handlebars and hit my helmet without serious injury, and I'm sure I would have been in much worse shape otherwise. On cars the law requires seat belts and airbags and a variety of other legally enforced safety measures. If you have a study suggesting that helmets would significantly help I'd be curious to see it. [1] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7019a1.htm |
|
Interesting, but we're not talking about sport cycling, we're talking about ordinary commuting.
> helmets are quite effective at injury reduction.[1]
Your citation provides no support for your claim.
> Anecdotally I've flown over my handlebars and hit my helmet without serious injury, and I'm sure I would have been in much worse shape otherwise.
This is why we don't make public policy on the basis of anecdotes.
> On cars the law requires seat belts and airbags and a variety of other legally enforced safety measures.
All of which are a lot less unpleasant at the point of use than helmets.
> If you have a study suggesting that helmets would significantly help I'd be curious to see it.
The rates of head injury are comparable (something like a factor of 4 difference), head injuries are very common in car collisions, helmets are already routinely used in motor racing. The evidence is no weaker than that for bicycle helmet use.