|
|
|
|
|
|
by gforce_de
27 days ago
|
|
|
Yeah, thats slow - but the approach is at least interesting: I tried to compare it with other encoders for the sample (girl/face painting):
https://show.quicky.club/results/14/f8/f1/d8db84d57222d32db6... The PICO-result claim to achieve 0.268 bpp (bit-per-pixel):
Even webp (version 1) can do that good enough. I understand, that one needs really advanced hardware to decode this.
Not sure if this is worth the hassle. |
|
|