[sph]

Constructive cricitism: this would really benefit from a parsing layer and dealing with more abstract structures, rather than operating on strings and regular expressions.

I really hope this is not vibe coded, because my criticism, if this wasn’t the honest work of a beginner, would be much more scathing than that and would confirm all my biases against LLMs.

[patrick-ghetea]

Hi 'sph', sorry for the late reply, but I’ve been working on version 1.1. You’re absolutely right about cleaning up the code. Honestly, I’m not a Go programmer with extensive experience in the language, but that doesn’t mean I made it just for the sake of it! The code is admittedly rough, having been put together over a weekend—it’s more of a Minimum Viable Product than anything else. Version 2.0 will be a more professional implementation with a much cleaner codebase. If you’d like to check out or use Riscrithm v1.1 (which has many more useful features), I highly recommend visiting the repository!