|
|
|
|
|
|
by bonesss
17 days ago
|
|
|
> more subtle, odd, and beautiful than science fiction prepared us for. They are not the cold, calculating robots we were promised I’m not sure I agree with that take, per se. Asimovian robots (I, Robot; The Bicentennial Man), were subtle and interacted with us in odd ways and had aspirations and earned meaning in peoples lives. [They could also help us type up our notes, so exactly the same as LLMs actually, #AsimovWasRight] LLMs, on the other hand, lie, lie about lying, fail to be honest, then own up to lying in ways that are more in line with tyve AI horror of Space 2001. “I’m sorry, Dave, I rm -rf’d to fix the typo. That was bad <sad emoji>. It’s not just failure, it’s failure with a middle-finger <middle-finger emoji>.] |
|
|