|
|
|
|
|
|
by delusional
17 days ago
|
|
|
> It’s basically saying that good engineers are better at using the tool. That's extremely reductive. It's perfectly possible for an engineer to be both a fantastic engineer, and bad at using AI. The opposite also exists, the great AI user, who is a terrible engineer. The idea that these two "skills" are somehow 100% correlated or there's a causation link between them is completely unfounded. The person who becomes a fine engineer with AI, might have been an absolutely terrible engineer without it. |
|
|
In this era, AI native skills are the major factor, alongside system design, which define who's fantastic. As an example, deep programming language or framework knowledge is a commodity now and not meaningful as a skill difference.