[zaneyard]

What is the point of this comment? Do you mean to say we should cease the pursuit of DEI because we've "come so far"? Of course that's engaging with you with the assumption that you're not intentionally ignoring the weaponization of the movement in the US to further the goals of the current administration.

[po1nt]

That would be a strawman. I am not living in US and don't care about US politics other than they are rising my diesel prices.

I'm just pointing out that historically this is the most DEI friendly we have ever been. If americans would be able to see outside a 4 year election cycle and realise there is a whole world outside the TDS zone, we could have a more civilised conversation than throwing strawmans around.

[zaneyard]

I'm not refuting what you said, I'm asking you to elaborate why you said it.

[po1nt]

Because I feel like it's unappreciative to act like we didn't make any progress. It's really degrading to people that really did put in an effort (like myself). It's like comming to a celebration of a sport victory with "you could have done better" attitude.

So let's now focus on why you assumed a hidden meaning somehow connected to "current administration"? Why this knee jerk reaction?