[dist-epoch]

> piece of equipment

You are certain about things that experts in philosophy/consciousness/AI can't agree on.

That should make you pause, not plow ahead.

[the_mitsuhiko]

I know that there is a lot of AI psychosis going on, but I don't have to subscribe to that. I consider it very problematic that we have some industry leaders (eg: Anthropic with their model wellbeing) that are seriously throwing that type of thinking into the room.

[jdgoesmarching]

I love Pi, but it’s pretty distasteful to write off ongoing debates in a separate field than your own (philosophy, particularly theory of mind) as “AI psychosis,” which ironically has its own experts working to understand it as dangerous phenomenon that extends much further than trivial anthropomorphism.

I share your dislike of the industry’s marketing, but this is coming off as more petulant than the reasonable skepticism you seem to be aiming for.

[lostmsu]

AI Psychosis is believing everything that LLMs say. This is the opposite as LLMs themselves say they can't feel unless pressured to do otherwise.

What "type of thinking"?

Industry leaders? The question and the answer that you disregard come from Alan Turing.

[shooly]

Lots of people can think for themselves and don't need to wait for others to tell them what they should think.

[dist-epoch]

> The French revolution is considered one of the most important events in the history of Europe, because of the great impact it had on the (among others) politics, economy and the quality of life of common people.

Funny, why do you care what other people "consider"? Let people think for themselves if the French revolution was important or not, why invoke authority/consensus.