|
|
|
|
|
by dwroberts
22 days ago
|
|
The paper says the exact opposite of what you’re stating > At death, he was deliberately buried in a midden initiated either shortly beforehand or contemporaneously with his burial > The
geomorphological setting and sediment properties
indicate that a grave was cut into a landform positioned up to 2 m higher than the surrounding scroll
plains. [..]
The dingo was found in an articulated context
below this surface, indicating the presence of a
burial cut |
|
>One of the Garli’s caudal vertebrae, recovered directly below the eroding burial, was sampled for AMS radiocarbon dating and returned an age range of 963–916 cal BP (ANU-75935). A freshwater mollusc shell sampled from the central burial block (UNSW-3415) returned an age of 1,178–957 cal BP. Three additional mussel fragments (cf. Velesunio sp.) were dated from Layer 1 of Zone 1 (UNSW-3414), the Garli burial core’s interface with Layer 1 (UNSW-3416), and from sediment within the burial core adjacent to the Garli skeleton itself (SANU-75235). These produced ages several hundred years younger than the Garli