[chneu]

Yup. Anything someone disagrees with is now "written by ai" as if that invalidates what was written.

[kstrauser]

I don’t think it’s even that. Someone could post an Emily Dickinson work and people would race to be the first to observe the number of tell-tale em dashes, pleased that they were cleverer than the other readers for not being tricked.

[0xDEFACED]

i agree with the premise of the article. i also wish the author had cared enough about such an important topic to actually write about it themselves. doing otherwise disrespects the reader

[kstrauser]

That’s begging the question by assuming it was wasn’t written by themselves.

[0xDEFACED]

in this particular case it feels like a very safe assumption