[YetAnotherNick]

Why can't someone ask what happened in Ilya's mind. Firing Sam and then signing the solidarity letter of Sam to leave OpenAI if was fired. Other than that, all other information seems kind of just going over the surface.

[krackers]

>what happened in Ilya's mind

I thought Ronan Farrow's investigate essay answered that pretty satisfactorily? https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/13/sam-altman-may...

[wdr1]

It's paywalled. Could you recap for us?

[krackers]

https://archive.is/c7YNw - it's worth a read, summarizing his writing would be a disservice

[baobabKoodaa]

Infinite recaptcha loop

[cma]

Part of the counter was Microsoft was going to try and hire everyone individually, compensating for the lost stock appreciation, without the org itself, if they went through with maintaining the firing. I think that could have been much harder to pull off, but maybe they made them believe it was an inevitable outcome.

[tasuki]

Yes, that, please! I also never understood why the board resigned after ousting Sam...

[tyre]

Because they lost and crumbled. They were unbelievably outmatched by Sam (a world-class manipulator) and Satya (the money behind OpenAI and himself a political genius.)

They were outmaneuvered, panicked, and folded.

Did they have to? No. But in the moment they thought they were on the precipice of nuking a deca-billion dollar company, their life’s greatest work, and a generational company.

It’s hard to stand against what they did. Unsurprising they couldn’t.

[YetAnotherNick]

Then they should have made the position clear to the public, or at the very least have some communication with the employees. It's not hard to say that they were against Sam for some particular reason, if they are firing him. At least if the reason is good that might have given them some credibility.

And why did Ilya become Sam lover after 2 days?

[maplethorpe]

> Then they should have made the position clear to the public

From what I understand, their legal counsel advised them not to speak publicly. Being inexperienced in this sort of political game, they thought they were doing the right thing.

[Ey7NFZ3P0nzAe]

I just want to point out that it was the company's legal counsel I believe. Hence the "right thing" was only the right thing for the company. Not necessary for the greater good or their conscience.

[rfv6723]

The employees are on Sam's side. Employees works for money and Sam brought money in.

[YetAnotherNick]

This is so obviously wrong I don't know how this theory got popular. OpenAI had everything from compute to brand name to contracts. Sam wasn't the reason the money was coming, employees and OpenAI were. Even if Sam bought them money, board could still tell the reason of firing Sam rather than keeping it a secret.

And why did Ilya flip? He doesn't have much to gain by being in non profit when he could get more money elsewhere.

[Recursing]

At the time gwern alleged it was because of Brockman's wife https://old.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/181o1q4/co...

[jstummbillig]

I mean this in the best sense possible: Ilya is obviously a very strange human being. People seem to always entirely ignore this when discussing what happened at OpenAI and I feel including it serves well when trying to explain much of what happened.

[paulddraper]

> It’s hard to stand against what they did.

It’s still unclear at what happened, to make Sam unfit to be the CEO.