[theanonymousone]

I'm wondering whether ReactOS can exploit Claude et. al. to their fullest and "recreate" Windows 2000/95. I may donate some tokens for that cause.

[CursedSilicon]

That sounds like a terrifying legal minefield that they would not want to tread

[theanonymousone]

Is it not safe to assume Window source code is not present in the LLM training data?

[stavros]

No: https://archive.org/download/windows-source-code

[happycube]

There are repos on github. Which, technically, means you can download Windows source from Microsoft. Just not legally.

[xandrius]

Slap a fair use on it and call it a day.

[rvnx]

> Anthropic offers a formal copyright indemnification policy for its enterprise customers using the Claude API. The policy protects businesses from copyright infringement claims arising from authorized use of Claude or its generated outputs

So just claim it is Claude

[greenbit]

What's that phrase, "derivative work" or something?

[leni536]

But surely anything the LLM outputs is clear of licensing requirements /s

Or would Microsoft like to argue otherwise in court?

[leobuskin]

I've used Claude to fix/reconstruct & build leaked Win2k3 on Linux with original toolchain via Wine. This approach included full gdi sources reconstruction. I just don't know what to do with this, it's kinda difficult to "wash" on this scale

[hulitu]

Run it as your daily driver and trust your data to it. /s