Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by triprjt 23 days ago
i think he meant having stuff that he brought to life
1 comments

But he didn't, it was given to him by AI.
I'd say many fathers are pretty happy "having kids given to them by a woman" (to use your terminology).

It seems you wouldn't give them credit for it, but most of them appear to feel quite a bit of responsibility for bringing those to life.

A woman is a human being. An AI is a machine.
Which makes your point make less sense?

I plant a seed, a human being carries it to fruition for 9 months through her determination, love and literal life blood, and I can claim I brought the seed to life.

He plants an idea and patiently coaxes a machine to spit out the code that matches it, you're giving the machine the credit.

I don't get it.

If he was constraining the AI's output, his input was meaningful.

Did you ever bring anything to life? Whatever it is, you are also relying on the work others have done before you and standing on the shoulders of giants.