|
|
|
|
|
by bhelkey
25 days ago
|
|
> I still haven't heard a solid explanation of how taxing loans as "income" is going to work. The idea is that taking a secured loan out using an asset as collateral would be a taxable event for that asset. That is to say, if you buy a house for $400,000 and it appreciates to be worth $850,000 then take a home equity loan out against the house, you would owe capital gains on the $450,000 appreciation. With the current $250,000 capital gains exclusion for primary residence, this would result in ~$30,000 of capital gains tax. |
|
Doesn't that puts valuations in the hands of people who could conspire to manipulate them, creating false data points?
For example, suppose you bought something for $25 a long time ago, and it has, very unofficially, appreciated to ~$100.
I could lend you $100, and the contract will say that I'm only asking for it to be partially secured with collateral, which will be, oh that "$25" asset which obviously hasn't appreciated in value at all. Poof, no gains tax.
I think the real issue here has to do with dodges in the Estate Tax, which is the endgame that these delaying games are meant to reach.