[NitpickLawyer]

Writing marketing 10 times doesn't invalidate the (many) claims from many respectable sources that the model is a step change in cybersec. There's also the report [1] from the Brits that track cyber capabilities since '22 or '23 and they've also confirmed it's a step change (together with 5.5 cyber or whatever they call it).

Marketing is like propaganda. It doesn't need to be based on false facts. Of course they're gonna milk it, keep it private and so on. But that doesn't mean the model is bad. Or that others are as good (apparently they're not there yet).

[1] - https://www.aisi.gov.uk/blog/our-evaluation-of-openais-gpt-5...

[casey2]

Please don't misrepresent the article it says clearly "a step up in cyber performance over previous frontier models" and that gpt-5.5 is on their tests is slightly better than mythos.

[NitpickLawyer]

Scroll to the graph labeled "Completed steps..."

If that doesn't convince you that both mythos and 5.5 are a step up (several steps, hah) nothing will.