[fallpeak]

This is slightly more tasteful slop than average (I'm thinking probably Claude rather than ChatGPT?), but it's still 100% AI written: https://www.pangram.com/history/c55ab69b-e0a9-49a0-8056-2fcd...

[0x3f]

This... is not a reliable AI detection method at all.

[fallpeak]

You are incorrect. There, now we've both made unsupported assertions. Care to provide any evidence for your position?

For what it's worth, when I provide a Pangram link it's because I can already tell something is AI and I'm attempting to provide objective third-party confirmation so the conversation doesn't just degrade into me asserting that I have superior taste to you.

[extr]

Pangram is highly reliable.

[jemmyw]

It can't be that good, I gave it some posts I wrote before llms were a thing and it gave them all 60%+ of the content as written by AI.

[extr]

ok thank you for this anecdote

[jemmyw]

Not really an anecdote, strictly, just a single point of evidence.

[arnon]

sorry, but i wrote this myself