[abc123abc123]

You make claims. Release the books, and people can then verify what you say. If you do not release the books, it is only natural for many people to suspect something wrong.

[sanity]

It isn't "natural" to make baseless accusations based on zero evidence.

[abc123abc123]

Of course there is. Anyone is completely justified in asking what their politicians do, how their non-profits spend their money, or what ever.

The fact that evidence is not provided, if anything, is an indication of potential wrong doing.

I also note that you did not actually respond to what I said. This is additional indication of some potential wrong doing.

[sanity]

> The fact that evidence is not provided, if anything, is an indication of potential wrong doing.

No, that's not how evidence works.

You're starting from the assumption of wrongdoing and then treating the lack of evidence as confirmation of your suspicion.

Meanwhile we've spent the last 5 years publicly building a working decentralized platform.

[abc123abc123]

That's exactly how it works. I suspect _you_ of wrong doing in a non-profit. I ask you do release the books, and if this is not done, I take that as proof of wrong doing. If the books are hidden and cannot be published, no one has any business giving you a dime.

And you are still not addressing the question here, which only compounds the suspicions.

I win this argument, and you lose.

[vitally3643]

I think you steal money from local orphanages and stomp kittens in your free time. Release your bank account and provide bodycam footage or you will confirm your guilt.

I win this argument and you lose.

[sanity]

> I win this argument, and you lose.

lol