Reasoning by analogy doesn’t work if your analogy isn’t well matched.
The analogy proposed here is correct rewritten as:
If one person uses an AI trained across copyrighted data, then that’s ok.
But if everyone uses that AI, it’s not ok.
Which is a bit of an irrelevant point.
The analogy proposed here is correct rewritten as:
If one person uses an AI trained across copyrighted data, then that’s ok.
But if everyone uses that AI, it’s not ok.
Which is a bit of an irrelevant point.