|
|
|
|
|
|
by lelanthran
27 days ago
|
|
|
> But an LLM being trained on works, and generating something based off of that training is not a duplication of any specific copyrighted material, and is wholly unique is not duplication. Right[1], and humans can do that, no problem - ingesting existing material and recombining them to produce something new (not necessarily unique) is a right that humans are afforded. The question being asked is, since we don't allow that right to any other tools, why does this tool need an exemption? ------------- [1] Not really (i.e. I don't necessarily agree with this point), but lets assume it for the sake of this discussion. |
|
|