Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by outside1234 32 days ago
At least he got the premise right, if not the implementation. That is better than 50% of articles. :)
2 comments

The premise being that the root cause of walled gardens, enshittification, data trading etc. is IP ? Get outa here ...
No that’s the implementation, the premise is that the current internet is not working for us (the people) and we need to move to something that does.
Any thoughts on reticulum? https://reticulum.network/

I've been thinking of building out a network of nodes in Taipei. Chatting with people this weekend at g0v summit about it. There's many reasons in Taiwan we could use an internet that's not the internet. If not today, then tomorrow...

I think we need DNS for all, not just the rich-enough-to-register-a-domain.

If everyone could register their publicKey:IPv6 pair then why would we go to FB at all if we could talk directly with each other?

I mean, yeah, if you made a non-interoperable internet2, no one would use that, and therefore no marketer would use that too. In this sense this article is 100% correct.