[conductr]

Funny that I feel this same way around articles published on The New Yorker but have never once seen the same criticism about their articles. Usually it’s praised as great writing in the comment sections wherever it’s discussed. This observation predates AI by quite a while. In this case, I think its repetition is on purpose. I heard of the Flipper One recently and assumed it was a new version of Flipper Zero. I didn’t understand it was different. Even after they asserted it was at first, I didn’t fully grasp it until later in the article where the Layer 0/1 infographic was presented. This is quite simply consumer education around their products. Repetition isn’t always a bad thing, sometimes it helps and sometimes it’s done purposely.