|
|
|
|
|
|
by tyre
34 days ago
|
|
|
If he kneecapped an advancement for the language intentionally, then, well, yikes! It's a tautology to say that it isn't bad because the creator said it shouldn't be there. That's not what you want to see from leadership. Ruby has `do … end` blocks that are readable and greatly improve the language, without turning it into a "functional" language. |
|
|