|
|
|
|
|
by ori_b
21 days ago
|
|
This seems like a non-sequitur. The entire point of AI is that it's able to generalize and perform at or above human level. Let me know the next time your camera is able to simulate conceptualizing something. Or is your argument that AI is permanently doomed to not work? |
|
What happened to art since?
We got artistic photography on top of paintings as well. It did not become widespread right away as people were mostly enamored by the simplicity of getting a realistic image first. But after that died away, people made art out of photography too.
Yes, those who did landscapes or portraits for hire were affected financially, but we ended up with more art, not less.
If I need to spell it out: genAI for image generation will also become an avenue for real artistic expression, as some pioneers are demonstrating, even if image generation is democratized, there will be a difference between art and non-art. It will also not kill conventional art either.