|
|
|
|
|
|
by kevinwang
21 days ago
|
|
|
Just reread this comment and it's not easy to understand, but the edit window is passed. What I meant is that they describe loglogn the same way you could describe O(n) or O(n^2) -- it "tends to infinity with n", even though my mental model for loglogn is to treat it as barely more than constant. See: https://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/148197/who-said-first... |
|
|