[iLoveOncall]

> What you're suggesting is that someone connected to Open AI solved this very hard math problem, but then rather than taking credit for it, falsely attributed it to AI?

I'm suggesting that OpenAI invested a lot of resources and money in having someone (or a group of people) disprove this conjecture, so they could claim their LLM disproved it. Yes.

I'm not sure why you're surprised by this, given that everything that Altman has said in the past has turned out to be a lie.

The fact that they gave an EDITED (even rewritten, from the PDF itself) chain of thought is just further proof. Why not give the raw one alongside? No reason at all, except if it doesn't exist.