[andsoitis]

If that were true, then one would expect a competitive fund that does just that and that give higher ROI than an S&P 500 index fund (or index ETF) when you consider expense ratio. What is a such a fund? Or, alternatively, can you point us to a comprehensive list of those companies you would exclude from the index to get superior returns?

[juleiie]

My returns are around 20 percent per year for years. I lack will and energy to list everything I owned but it’s basically a method of value investing + momentum trading so two opposites. You could say it’s a diversification of investing philosophies.

Honestly it’s a free for all game so no one has any interest to share their secrets and methods. When you lose money I make money. Better player wins.

[andsoitis]

> My returns are around 20 percent per year for years.

That's unbelievable! Even Warren Buffet only makes 19% - 20% compounded every year. That would make you one of the top investors ever.

[amanaplanacanal]

Lots of people think they can do better than the index funds. Some do, for a while.

[coliveira]

Buffet was severely handicapped by the amount of money he had available. He mentioned that himself. If he had to manage only a smaller amount of money he would easily achieve 40% or more per year.

[cheinic6493]

> Even Warren Buffet only makes 19% - 20% compounded every year. That would make you one of the top investors ever.

Not really.

Plenty of hedge funds and HFT firms make 40-100% each year (before fees) over 30-40 years…

Citadel’s “stock picking ability” is 40% annual returns since 1999

They just don’t advertise this because it’ll make retail traders and passive ETF investors really sad

[phatfish]

I doubt it makes people sad (well not me at least) because the buy in to get Citadel to invest for you is what 10? 50 million?

You could hit up juleiie from above for his/her winning method I suppose, or you put a portion of your savings into an appropriate ETF and get on with your life.