Or they fixed the issue to remain compliant so GCP would restore access. Again, I know it's fashionable to hate on Google here, but there are always 2 sides to every story.
Just saying either way is possible unless both sides of the story are out in the open. You seem to start from a point of view of malice, I'm simply suggesting possible alternatives.
> Or..they couldn't remain compliant with one of the strictest cloud vendors' policies.
Which is it? They can comply or they can’t? Both sides can’t be true at the same time.