|
|
|
|
|
by qnleigh
25 days ago
|
|
I want to push back against the notion that the math already exists in the weights, both in the practical and the philosophical sense. The LLM had to do an enormous amount of computation to find the counterexample. We know it wasn't looking up the answer from its internal representation, because the conjecture was unproven. The proof came into being when the model output it, and if they'd run it for less time or asked it something else then the conjecture would still be unsolved. I'm also afraid of a world where AI completely replaces human mathematicians, but if we remain collaborators, then that's a world I can still feel excited about. |
|