[slg]

Let me be as straightforward as I can be. You are debating a straw man that arose out of you inserting your own adverb into my first comment. You saw "unrestricted" as "completely unrestricted" rather than the "relatively unrestricted" I intended. That intention should have been clear because I was talking in a thread about Meta so my comments can be assumed to be about the systems in which Meta operates. Everyone else here seems to have understood my intention. Your refusal or inability to recognize that original misreading is causing you to misread my other comments.

[FloorEgg]

Shame on me for assuming the words you wrote were the words you meant.

I assumed that by "unrestricted capitalism" you meant laissez faire, or in alignment with how it's defined in textbooks, Google, or any modern LLM model, etc...