[cweagans]

> Whenever you have control over somebody else's organism, suicide isn't something which makes sense definitionally, even if his own body was used to kill him.

> your vendors are likely neurocompromised as well.

What in the world are you talking about.

[d-cc]

Much of the drug trade is ran less than consensually, as is common knowledge.

Often even people envolved aren't even aware these technologies are being utilized, to those who are, their position is often simple: you do what we say or we torture you, even in protective custody, as surgery isn't really practical.

[cweagans]

To be clear, your claim is that 'much of the drug trade is r[u]n less than consensually' via some kind of undocumented, unknown-to-most brain implant that can be used to remotely torture people for non-compliance?

That claim falls apart as soon as it touches reality: there are a _lot_ of people who are involved in the drug trade, now and in the past. At some point, one of those people would definitely have had a CT or an MRI on their skull (e.g. my dentist does a whole head CT every 5 years as part of the normal process and insurance pays for it). Surely _one_ of those people would have noticed a brain implant.

This sounds extremely made up.

[d-cc]

>At some point, one of those people would definitely have had a CT or an MRI on their skull

The tech is adversarially designed, you're assuming the medical supply chains are not compromised, and are dramatically underestimating the sophistication involved here generally.

You can't even assume the people interpreting the results are uncompromised, are trained to interpret results in the context of adversarial technology, or are even physiologically able to accurately interpret what they are looking at. This has it's roots in military intelligence, it's not a trivial compromise.

[cweagans]

You understand how this sounds, right? It’s very “I totally have a girlfriend but she lives in Canada and is a model” vibes.

Do you have literally any proof? Otherwise, this is all just a silly made up story as far as I’m concerned.

[dmos62]

Post some links, or keywords.

[d-cc]

There is a long history of militant and/or criminal (what's the difference) usage of adversarially designed brain-computer interfaces that you will not find documented.

Unless you have proper clearance or are involved with one of the parties propagating them, anyway.

[cweagans]

> There is a long history [...] that you will not find documented.

Then how do you know about it? This sounds extremely made up.

[d-cc]

I've literally experienced torture first hand.

It's not just the drug trade, and torture isn't even the primary focus of the technology.

[dmos62]

What torture did you experience, by whom and why?