Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by nathan_compton 22 days ago
Weird thing to say about a report which literally has the attached mathematical proof.
1 comments

Except its not a proof. It's an existential proof of what? Projecting points and loosing density? Nah, it's wrong. At least with Edros you could solve f(x) or not solve it (inf). You can not with this. All they did was balance a really fancy quadratic equation. The projection from C^f to R² doesn't demonstrate geometric injectivity, so nⱼ = |X| isn't established, and the bound collapses.
You got downvoted, but I'm a bit curious - can you elaborate on these critiques?