|
|
|
|
|
by vegadw
27 days ago
|
|
used. Apple used. It's legally a dead trademark, so Apple is claiming ownership of something they've already abandoned, but enforcing that nobody else can reclaim it, despite being a good name. That's not right, they don't just get to name squat. |
|
I think holding that kind of power over devices people own is problematic, but I seem to be in the minority here.