Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by hermannj314 22 days ago
Most people would spend 40 days in jail for $800k. Why wouldn't police collude together to arrest one another? This feels like a free money glitch. I agree without accountability this provides a huge incentive to enrich your friends quite easily off the taxpayer.
4 comments
usefulcat 22 days ago
You're making a big mistake by completely failing to account for the inherent (not to mention quite large) uncertainties in this kind of situation.

A priori, it's not "40 days in jail == $800k payday", it's "some unknown number of days in jail and risk of a conviction in exchange for a chance at a payday of unknown value".

link
OGWhales 22 days ago
Not to mention, the side effects extend beyond jail time. For example, your name gets plastered everywhere too.
link
account42 21 days ago
That still makes these kinds of settlements feel more like a lottery than fair compensation.
link
usefulcat 21 days ago
I agree, and that's part of the point. "Free money glitch" does not sound like a valid description of any lottery I've ever heard of.

There's a reason (several, probably) why you don't actually see cases of police arresting each other and then suing to enrich themselves.

link
RIMR 22 days ago
This is an extremely paranoid take. Sure, $800k for 40 days is good money, but it also makes the department look terrible, and sets a precident that they have violated rights in the past. It isn't exactly a "free money glitch", since this wasn't just some automatic "$20k/day" judgment, this was damages for violating his freedom of speech.
link
xtiansimon 19 days ago
That’s a calculus for the destitute and mentally ill seeing in a moment someone driving distracted and jumping in front of their car in hopes of getting an insurance payout. Never mind the real possibility of death or significant loss of quality of life.

Only when you have nothing left to lose. And by that time you may be known in your society as mentally ill, and lose in the court because your actions are transparent.

link
enoint 22 days ago
Isn’t Jan 6 a better example? The next Jan 6 will be full of those seeking eligibility into a potential slush fund
link