[szmarczak]

> Being the first to do something is always impressive.

The companies are making the AI creative (whatever the definition), not her. Don't give her credit for something she had no impact on.

She's using AI for world building and working on top of it. Ask a few people whose job is world building (e.g. games) and no one will tell you that using AI is to be proud of.

[bawolff]

The fact is she didn't actually use AI, so this is hypothetical.

> The companies are making the AI creative

None have managed to at the level we are talking about. There is also some skill involved in the use of AI. If she somehow made AI operate on a level far beyond the status quo, that would be an achievement. She didn't so its moot, but if she did it would be an accomplishment.

[szmarczak]

> The fact is she didn't actually use AI

She actually did. See my other comment:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48210766

She also said:

> jak fantastycznie powiększa on horyzonty i pogłębia myślenie kreatywne

> how incredibly it widens horizons and deepens creative thinking

AI doesn't have the ability to improve one's creative thinking. In order to improve, you have to practice - there's nothing more to it and it applies to all professions.

Also, I wonder how did she come to the conclusion that it does so.

She uses the AI for a job that should be hers, not the AI's.

Furthermore, she publicly stated she bought the highest plan without specifying the model.

> None have managed to at the level we are talking about.

You seem to be implying somebody accused her of relying purely on AI, which no one actually did.

Many good Polish writers (as stated in the Lubimy Czytać article) said that for them it's unimaginable to use AI for writing, in any form.