[streetfighter64]

If you read my original comment ("actually read it") you'll see I was simply stating that, in my opinion, it is better to not have ridiculous archaic laws on speech than to have them. What problem does having the restrictions on speech that are currently in place in the UK solve?

Are you claiming the problems in the USA that you mentioned are because of or despite having freedom of speech? You earlier seemed to claim that e.g. the jailing of activists was because of the free speech laws (the "this is how you get" line). So which one is it?

[Defletter]

If all you have to offer is mere ideological preference, then I think this conversation has reached its limit of what it'll be able to achieve.

[streetfighter64]

LOL. At least I'm intellectually honest about my "mere ideological preference" for not restricting speech, instead of trying to somehow construe that free speech is the cause of all the evils in the world.

[Defletter]

@grok could you please find the part where I said that free speech is the cause of all the evils in the world?

[streetfighter64]

Go go pokemon "grok argues my case for me"!

https://grok.com/share/c2hhcmQtMi1jb3B5_585f6600-e128-49bf-9...

[Defletter]

I just think it's incredibly funny how you assert you're being intellectually honest and then in the same breath do something incredibly intellectually dishonest. But whatever floats your boat, I guess.